Thursday, September 1, 2011

Environmental Health Workshops

Participatory Analysis such as Community Mapping, Health Calendar, and a SWOT analysis were used as information gathering tools.  Development practitioners use this information to then design educational seminars, projects, and initiatives in the community.  I used our analysis to design 3 half-day participatory Environmental Health Workshops, one of which was conducted with the Panamanian Red Cross.  The activities in the workshop came from the UN & World Health Organization's PHAST Guide for Health Promotion.

The EH Workshops had 3 goals:
  • Analyze the community's current health practices.
  • Connect drinking water and lack of sanitation to diarrheal diseases cited on the Health Calendar.
  • Provide multiple sanitation options and analytically select the appropriate solution. 

I started with an activity called 3-Pile Sorting where members were given cards with drawings of with a range of good and bad health practices I observed in the community:  from washing hands with soap before eating to defecating in the river, from using a composting latrine to throwing garbage in the river.  In groups they have a discussion to sort the cards under Good for Health, Okay for Health, and Bad for Health. 


As they presented the Bad for Health practices cards, I showed them how those practices brought about the diarrhea and vomiting they cited on their Health Calendar.  This image of how open defecation connects to ingesting feces brought one person in the room to gag.


I then asked how the Good for Health cards could cut these disease vectors.  Latrines and hand washing came up as the solutions.

What kind of latrine is best for Alto Playón?  I asked the community list characteristics of what they want in a latrine:

  • No smell
  • No flies
  • Proximity & Safety
  • Private
  • Maintenance
  • Cost




We then tested their chosen characteristics against a pit latrine, a composting latrine, and a septic system. The pit lost because it smells horrible and attracts mosquitos.  The septic system is far too expensive and unfeasible for a rural community with no running water.  In every workshop the Composting Latrine won!  




The workshops were a success.  In a participatory manner the community not only took a look at their current water and sanitation practices, but also together picked the solution.  This lays the ground work for further education on composting latrines and the formation of a functioning Health Committee. 

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Broken (Human) Infrastructure

Why doesn't the aqueduct in Alto Playón work?

About 3 years ago Alto Playón was donated an aqueduct which pumps river water to two 650 gallon tanks, which is pumped to the houses.  In order for the aqueduct to work, families need to pay $2 a month for gasoline and to pay a plumber to run the pump.  The system functioned for only 1 month, and the women and children continue to carry water to their houses.

A Daily Usage analysis revealed that the current system has enough capacity to meet their needs.  Everyone agrees that it would be easier to have water pumped to their house than carry it.  And all of the infrastructure is in place - a pump (although broken, can be fixed), tanks, pipes, and taps.  Ostensibly, things should be fine.

So why does the aqueduct not work?  Tough question with multiple possibilities:
  • No community investment.  The community put no investment into their down development:  no time, planning, or money was put down on their part.  They were handed all of the infrastructure and worked for 1-2 days to bury pipe. 
  • Mis-management.  There are households who want the aqueduct to work, I've talked to them many times.  They are hesitant to pay because other families don't pay and still take from the system.  It is the responsibility of the Water Committee to cut these families from the system, but they don't.
  • Poor infrastructure.  No training was given to the community members on how to fix the pump or fix broken PVC.
  • Customs.  Emberá-Wounaan women are so accustomed to carrying water from the river that they aren't bothered by not having an aqueduct.  The men are used to having water in the house, so they don't notice the difference.
When organizations want to help, infrastructure is easy to pick because you can quantify it and see it done quickly.  Also, our way of thinking doesn't register that someone wouldn't use a technological improvement.  More often than not however, donated infrastructure is seen broken and unused.

I am learning that there are multiple ways in which development has to take place.  I gave the Water Committee a lesson on thermoforming - forming PVC pipe connections with hot oil.  I'm working with the Water Committee to get more organized, be transparent, and enforce their rules.  I implore the women to think about how much easier it would be to have water pumped to their house.  In a community meeting I broke it down to them like this:  your water bill is $2.00 a month, 7 cents per day.  Is carrying five, 40 pound buckets of water everyday worth less than 7 cents?


Thursday, August 4, 2011

40 Pounds of Water

What does it feel like to carry 40 pounds of water on your head for 20 minutes, 3-5 times a day, everyday? Just ask the women in Alto Playón and throughout much of the Comarca Emberá-Wounaan.  Everyone in the world has a system for water in their house.  Whether you carry it, use rainwater, have a gravity driven system, or pumps and pipes send it to your faucet.

I took a survey as qualitative and quantitative study of the water situation in the community.  I spoke with the women about how much water they use on a daily basis, and whether or not they treat their water.  Here are the results:


The Daily Water Usage results told me that the current system has enough capacity to deliver their water needs.  I also learned that most families don't like to chlorinate their water and that I could make an impact educating households on treating their water.  

Although this was an information gathering exercise, it was also to raise consciousness around water.  I presented this information to the Water Committee to motivate them to start running the aqueduct again.  We re-tooled the monthly payments, laid down new rules - such as being cut off from the system for those who don't pay.  In a town meeting the President presented this to the community and only 16 families chose to participate.